PCAC Quarterly Report
July - September 2000

You may jump down the document by clicking on the appropriate link below:

[Download as PDF file]


Permanent Citizens Advisory Committee (PCAC)

PCAC Weighs in on US EPA Diesel Standards Proposals
During the quarter, the PCAC gave its support to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Heavy-Duty Engine and Vehicle Standards proposal and related Highway Diesel Sulfur Control Requirements proposal. The EPA aims to foster better ambient air quality by setting more stringent standards for both engine manufacturers and fuel refiners.

The PCAC is well aware of the need to clean up emissions in metropolitan areas such as New York's and is mindful of the link between diesel emissions and increased childhood asthma risks. In written comments on the proposals, the PCAC urged EPA not to give in to assertions by fuel refiners, voiced at a public hearing earlier in the year, that the standards would prove costly and technically unfeasible for vehicle manufacturers. The PCAC noted that major vehicle manufacturing industry groups voiced strong support for the requirements at the same hearing.

PCAC Comments on Proposed Federal Planning Guidelines
The PCAC also commented on revised metropolitan transportation planning guidelines proposed by the U.S. Department of Transportation. The PCAC agreed with the requirement, included in the National Environmental and Policy Act and Related Procedures for Transportation Decisionmaking proposal, that the U.S. DOT retain the last word in determining the specific alternatives of transportation projects to be analyzed for environmental impacts.

The PCAC also agreed with a requirement included in the Statewide/Metroplitan Transportation Planning proposal to require metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs)­the agencies that disburse most federal transportation funds to urban areas­to consult with transit users when establishing regional plans.

However, the PCAC strongly urged the U.S. DOT to require MPOs to include rider representatives on their governing boards. Although many MPOs feel that the inclusion of citizen board members would be inappropriate since local elected officials sit on MPO boards, the PCAC noted that if the argument were taken to its logical conclusion, representatives of transit and highway agencies, themselves not elected officials, would also have to be denied board membership.

PCAC Discusses 2000-2019 MTA Capital Needs Assessment, State Transportation Bond Act
In September, the PCAC welcomed MTA Grants Director Gregory Kullberg and Planning Director William Wheeler to discuss the MTA 2000-2019 Capital Needs Assessment. The document details the theoretical funding needs for all projects desired by MTA agencies. The Council criticized the document for neither establishing project priority nor contingency plans in the event of funding shortfalls.

Individually, the PCAC's affiliated Councils also discussed New York State Transportation Bond Act referendum. The Act sought to authorize more than $3.8 billion in borrowing for highway and transit projects, with almost half of the amount going to the MTA to support the 2000-2004 capital program. As a whole, the PCAC expressed concerns over the increased debt burden which the Act would generate, and criticized the MTA for not elucidating contingency plans should the act fail. Individually, the Act received formal support from the MNRCC and the NYCTRC. The LIRRCC remained neutral.

PCAC Continues Participation in MTA Planning Studies
The PCAC continued to participate in advisory committee meetings for all major MTA and agency transit studies throughout the quarter. The PCAC reviewed and commented on the final report of the Long Island City Transportation Improvement Study, as well as the final scoping document of the LaGuardia Airport Subway Access study. The PCAC commented at length on the LIC report. The report, released after years of delay, was found to be poorly written and included stale data and erroneous information. The release of the report was prompted by a stern request from the Federal Transit Administration made earlier in 2000 for the MTA to submit final documents on moribund planning studies.

PCAC Receives Partial Response on "Mixed Signals" Report
The PCAC received a partial response from the MTA regarding its Spring report on MTA customer communications practices, Mixed Signals. Thomas Savage, NYC Transit senior vice-president­MetroCard Operations, informed the PCAC that Transit was considering ways to communicate electronically with customers should the MTA-wide ban on public email ever be lifted. Acceptance of customer e-mails, as is done by many other major transit agencies, was one of the report's main suggestions. The response followed a letter sent to MTA Chairman E. Virgil Conway asking for the MTA's appraisal of the report and its conclusions.

Return to top of document


Long Island Rail Road Commuters' Council (LIRRCC)

Council Helps Successfully Block Proposed Greenlawn Train Yard
After much public protest, led in good measure by Council Chair Lawrence Silverman, the railroad scrapped plans to examine the feasibility of constructing a train yard in Greenlawn. The Council acknowledges that the railroad is in need of new yard facilities to meet the needs of a growing ridership and increasing fleet, problems which will become critical when the East Side Access connection to Grand Central Terminal opens in 2010. However, the Council felt the addition of a rail yard would represent an unpleasant industrial burden in an otherwise overwhelmingly residential area of Greenlawn. Other potential yard sites remain under consideration by the railroad.

Council Meets with LIRR Staff on Parking, Equipment Issues
In July, the Council discussed parking issues with LIRR Parking Program Director Kevin Rush. The railroad is in the midst of a parking improvement program, including rehabilitation of old lots and construction of new facilities, where possible, which added 2,200 new or improved spaces during the 1995-1999 capital plan. The program continues in the current capital plan with a projected additional 1,300 new and 3,200 rehabilitated parking spaces by 2004.

In September, the Council welcomed Charles Kalkhof, LIRR chief mechanical officer­Maintenance of Equipment, and Mark Sullivan, general manager­Fleet Supervision, to discuss fleet issues. Messrs. Kalkhof and Sullivan described railroad efforts to eliminate HVAC problems and improve rehabilitation procedures. The Council also questioned the officials on continuing technical problems with the new diesel fleet, including technical problems on bi-level coaches and a spate of diesel locomotive fires. Messrs. Kalkhof and Sullivan assured the Council that the issues are being monitored by the railroad.

East End Diesel Service Lacking, Council Seeks Improvement
During the quarter, the Council wrote to the railroad to voice its desire for an increase in service to eastern Suffolk County. Currently, residents east of Ronkonkoma and Babylon are served by as few as three trains per day in each direction, even though East End population has steadily grown over the past 20 years. It is the opinion of the railroad that increases in East End diesel service must wait until the East Side Access connection with Grand Central helps ease constraints along the railroad caused by capacity limitations at Penn Station. However, the Council would like some East End alternatives to be examined now, including double-tracking and possibilities for rail or bus shuttle services.

Council Monitors Development of Forthcoming Electric Railcars, Ticket Vending Machines
During the quarter, members and staff had the opportunity to participate in customer focus groups regarding the interior design elements of the railroad's forthcoming M7 electric railcar and view a full-scale mockup. The Council looks forward to the new cars, which will include improved lighting, seating, bathrooms, as well as modern braking systems and electronic information readouts similar to those installed on bi-level diesel coaches. The new cars are expected to begin to enter revenue service in 2002.

Members and staff were also given a hands-on introduction to advanced-technology Ticket Vending Machines (TVMs). Similar to new MetroCard Vending Machines, the TVMs will allow customers to perform transactions on an ATM-style video touch screen and offer an ease of use not possible with the railroad's current, 1980s-era vending machines. The Council was assured that the new machines, scheduled to arrive during 2001, are adequately durable for outdoor installation. However, the railroad noted that all outdoor machines will be installed under a special awning enclosure.

Council Staff Attends Popular "Meet the President" Events
Council staff attended a series of "Meet the President" events held by acting LIRR President Kenneth Bauer at Penn Station and Flatbush Avenue. At the events, Mr. Bauer and LIRR staff spoke personally with commuters about railroad service. The events were well-received by riders, and are an example of the openness to customer concerns which the Council feels that Mr. Bauer has brought to the railroad. The Council has officially asked MTA Chairman E. Virgil Conway to be included in the decision to choose a permanent president for the railroad.

Cell Phone, Passholder Problems Continue to Vex Riders
During the quarter, Council members continued to note a rising trend in discourteous cell phone usage by customers. In addition, the Council discussed regular incidents of LIRR employees and other free passholders refusing to relinquish seats to paying riders, as required by MTA regulations governing the use of free passes. The railroad has repeatedly declined Council requests to take decisive action against these problems, beyond occasional onboard announcements. However, in the opinion of the Council, these problems merit inclusion in a major customer conduct campaign, similar to the Council's own 1999 "Happy Rails to You" campaign, which dealt with similar issues.

Return to top of document


Metro-North Railroad Commuter Council (MNRCC)

Council Discusses Customer Service Issues with Departmental Director
In July, the Council welcomed Thomas Tendy, Metro-North director­Customer Services. Mr. Tendy summarized major departmental activities since the beginning of his tenure as director in 1997, including changes in training practices, improved computerization of information, and the opening of the railroad's flagship customer service center in the Graybar Building, adjacent to Grand Central Terminal. The Council agreed with the current departmental practice of rating customer information representatives by the quality of information given rather than by the number of customers helped, as was done formerly.

Council Explores Creation of Adjudication Bureau for Right-of-Way, Onboard Offenses
During the quarter, the Council began an investigation into possibilities for the creation of a single, state-mandated adjudication bureau to deal with crimes committed onboard trains and along the right-of-way, including dumping, graffiti, and other types of vandalism. The Council is exploring an adjudication bureau as a way to overcome the existing difficulties in prosecuting offenders caused by the current legal necessity to prosecute offenders in individual localities. A similar adjudication bureau has been operated successfully to deal with offenses committed on NYC Transit property for many years. The idea for a Metro-North adjudication bureau arose from a discussion with George Walker, Metro-North vice-president­Operations, and John Wagner, director-­Maintenance of Way, at the Council's August meeting.

ACMU 1100 Issues Ongoing, Council Continues to Monitor
Throughout the quarter, the Council continued to experience problems with ACMU 1100 railcars, the oldest in the Metro-North fleet. Originally planned to be scrapped, unexpectedly strong ridership gains have required that the railroad keep the cars in revenue service until replacements arrive in mid-2004. However, the cars suffer from frequent public address and air conditioning breakdowns, and Council members note that train crews rarely make verbal station announcements when PA systems are out of order. The railroad has assured the Council that every effort will be made to keep the cars in good working order until they are finally retired. Even so, problems continue. The Council will remain vigilant on the matter until the cars are finally able to be removed from revenue service.

Railroad, Council Disagree on E-mail
In July, the MNRCC took issue with a decision by Metro-North not to honor a Council request to ask customers for their e-mail addresses on the railroad's customer survey forms. The railroad is constrained by an MTA policy barring electronic communications with the public. However, the Council feels that having such information on hand in advance would be an asset to Metro-North should the policy change. The Council and the PCAC in general have long criticized the policy, which places the MTA behind many other major transit agencies which have accepted customer emails for several years.

Members, Staff Tour Grand Central Upholstery Shop
In July, members and staff went on a tour of Metro-North's Grand Central Terminal upholstery shop by John Walpole, general manager­ Maintenance of Equipment. Annually, the shop replaces older seats in 48 railcars with new, flame-retardant materials and stronger support systems. The Council thanked shop staff for their efforts which combat the formerly prevalent and uncomfortable problem of "sit-through" cushion support failures.

Return to top of document


New York City Transit Riders Council (NYCTRC)

Council Hits Home Run in the Bronx: 2/5 Service Changes Benched
Bowing to widespread public and political opposition spearheaded by the NYCTRC, NYC Transit decided to shelve a plan to switch 2/5 service in the Bronx. Although proposed as a strategy to overcome longstanding track switching and merging challenges at 180th Street, the changes would have meant decreased peak service for central Bronx residents and longer commutes for Dyre Avenue 5 riders. Upon learning of the plan, the Council alerted Bronx Borough President Fernando Ferrer and other local officials of its impacts, mobilizing the groundswell of opposition that led to the plan's defeat.

Council Releases Subway Reliability Report, Grand Debate Follows
In August, the Council released its quadrennial examination of subway service reliability to wide media attention. The report, Timing Is Everything, found significant peak-hour reliability problems on several heavily used lines including virtually all IRT (numbered) lines. The report also criticized an NYC Transit plan to adopt a new measure of reliability called "wait assessment". In the opinion of the Council, the new measure would not reflect the experience of riders and would artificially inflate reliability figures when no real change had occurred.

The Council's concerns were echoed by other local voices, including the New York Times, the Daily News, the NYPIRG Straphangers Campaign, and some members of the New York City Council. The Council and the Straphangers Campaign jointly signed a letter to the MTA Inspector General asking for an analysis of the proposed measure. NYC Transit President Lawrence Reuter agreed to meet with the NYCTRC to discuss possible alternatives to wait assessment in the upcoming quarter.

Council Discusses Major Station Rehab Projects with NYCT Staff
In July, the Council met with Joseph Trainor, NYC Transit project manager- Escalators , Elevators, and Major Facilities, and other Transit officials and contractors, to discuss rehabilitation activities at Atlantic Terminal, Times Square, and 72nd Street/Broadway. Members and staff queried Transit officials on all three projects regarding measures taken to alleviate customer crowding and flow issues during construction activities, keep riders informed, and minimize service impacts. The Council previously discussed these projects with Mr. Trainor in May.

New Chair of NYC Transit Committee of MTA Board, Barry Feinstein, Meets with Council
In September, the Council welcomed Barry Feinstein, longtime MTA Board member and new chairman of the Board's NYC Transit Committee. Members discussed a variety of issues with Mr. Feinstein, but of primary concern were the introduction of articulated bus service on the M79 and M86 crosstown routes in Manhattan, and the State Transportation Bond Act.

The long articulated buses offer greater capacity for riders. However, they have elicited concerns over their viability under Manhattan traffic conditions and complaints that service levels were reduced, lengthening waiting times. The Council resolved to perform a field survey of the reliability of the new buses in the following quarter.

The Council also expressed concerns that the Bond Act, while promising funding for major transit projects including initial monies for a full-length Second Avenue subway, would represent a dangerously heavy debt burden. Ultimately, the Council resolved to support the measure.

Council Monitors In-Service Test of New IRT Trains
During the quarter, the Council monitored the introduction of the first two of 108 new-technology R142 and R142A trains into revenue-service testing on the 2 and 6 lines. The trains, which feature roomier interiors, improved lighting and air conditioning, electronic information readouts, automated announcements, and emergency intercoms, were well-received by riders. The Council sent a letter to Transit querying the agency about the low volume level of the automated announcements and legibility of exterior LCD displays. Transit informed the Council that announcement volume was being varied to determine the most convenient level and that all electronic signage met legibility requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act.

Diversion Information Problems Reported for Ninth Quarter in a Row
As has been reported many times previously, the Council yet again observed problems with the dissemination of useful and accurate subway service diversion information. In the most serious incident, diversion notices were misplaced, incorrect, or absent for a major weekend Broadway N/R line diversion affecting Brooklyn and Manhattan. Notices in Manhattan informed N/R customers to take the number 4 at Canal Street to reach Brooklyn. However, Canal Street is a local station not served by the express 4 train.

Worse, at 59th Street/Fourth Avenue in Brooklyn, diversion notices intended to inform customers that southbound local R service was running only from the northbound express track were posted solely on the northbound platform­ useless to hundreds of riders transferring from the N on the southbound platform. When informed of the error, station staff denied responsibility and refused to change the signs. Upon a complaint made by Council Associate Director Michael Doyle, NYC Transit formally apologized for the errors and informed the Council that disciplinary action would be considered for the staff in question.

Return to top of document

Home | About Us | LIRRCC | MNRCC | NYCTRC | Calendar | Quarterly Reports | Research Reports | MTA Travel Info | MTA Complaints | Feedback | Links